[CCTV Review] Out-of-control electric car？ Sad courier brother？ Where is the balance point？

In the past few days, a local "no motorcycle and no electricity" rectification campaign in Shenzhen has sparked heated discussions and exploded the circle of friends.

In this regard, the shenzhen public Traffic Police Bureau said today that it will discuss relevant issues with relevant departments on April 5. At present, there is no other violation of the law in express delivery vehicles, so the vehicles will not be detained temporarily.

In the face of this controversy about "no motorcycle and no electricity", some people are indignant, others clap their hands and say that they are reasonable. How to balance safety and convenience? Let’s listen to the opinions of netizens.

Viewpoint 1: Agree, well done.

It is often seen that these electric tricycles are rampaging and dangerous, especially in the residential area, driving so fast that pedestrians should pay attention to it from a distance. It is really scary and forbidden.

Viewpoint 2: Objection brings inconvenience to life.
　
It can’t be across the board. How many people will have to buy a car if electric cars are banned? The roads are even more blocked.

It brings inconvenience to commuting and picking up children from school. How to solve the "last mile" of freight?

Viewpoint 3: Agree, but with humanized measures.
　
I support banning motorcycles and limiting electricity in Shenzhen, but not all of them! First of all, for electric vehicles to carry passengers, there are those that don’t follow the traffic rules, and those in driving without a license are banned! You can’t ban tools that are convenient for travel, and electric vehicles are environmentally friendly vehicles.

Viewpoint 4: Objection, existence is reasonable, and it cannot be banned blindly.
　
"It is really inconvenient to transport goods by car if it meets the peak period at ordinary times. There must be demand for so many people to choose motorcycles and electric cars. "

The "ban" violates the development trend of low-carbon environmental protection and national policies, and deprives citizens of their traffic rights.

Cctv comment: no motorcycle and no electricity: should it or not?

The Shenzhen traffic police department’s strict investigation of motorcycles and electric bicycles is undoubtedly from the perspective of traffic management. In many cities, ubiquitous motorcycles and shuttling electric cars have become a major public hazard. Electric cars are fast and silent, and sometimes they suddenly appear to make pedestrians unprepared. What is even more troublesome is that it shuttles between motor vehicle lanes and non-motor vehicle lanes at will, which limits the idea of classified management.

Previously, some cities used to manage electric vehicles through "speed limit", but the effect was not obvious, and the management of motorcycles and electric vehicles still lacked effective means.

Motorcycles and electric cars should be controlled and strictly controlled, and there is nothing wrong with them. However, any policy should consider the "people’s livelihood cost".

At present, the rapid development of public transport still cannot meet the travel needs of residents, and the "last mile" of urban traffic still needs to be met by small vehicles such as electric vehicles. Point-to-point traffic demand in express delivery and other industries also depends on low-cost means of transportation such as electric vehicles.Even if the management of electric vehicles can improve the traffic order, the "people’s livelihood cost" is by no means negligible.

Governing motorcycles and electric vehicles is "people’s livelihood", and once banned, it will also damage "people’s livelihood".
　
Therefore, the governance of electric vehicles is no longer a simple "right and wrong question", but "how to manage" is more reasonable.The latest response of the Shenzhen police is: "If there is no other violation of the law, the car will not be detained for the time being." Obviously, this approach is more reasonable. Severe punishment for electric vehicles that violate traffic rules also achieves the goal of "from chaos to order". At the same time, it ensures the normal travel needs of residents.

Express delivery industry can only develop healthily if it abides by the rule of law.
　
Of course, in this process, it is also necessary for express delivery companies to strengthen the management and restraint of employees.You can’t violate the law just because the express delivery industry meets the needs of the masses.
　
After the "motorcycle ban", the express delivery industry needs to be adjusted. It can’t go its own way and stop indiscriminately under the name of "serving residents", which has become a "stubborn disease" for traffic safety. In fact, the express delivery industry in many countries relies on motor vehicles, and obeying traffic rules is the meaning of the topic.While our express delivery industry has achieved explosive growth, it is also in urgent need of continuous improvement in all aspects, and only in this way can we step into the track of benign development.

General Secretary of the Supreme Leader once emphasized that "governing a big country is like cooking a little fresh". Many difficult problems in social governance are not simply "prohibition" or "limitation", but should be solved by legal thinking and innovative ways. The management of motorcycles and electric vehicles is still a difficult problem in many cities. People hope that more cities can come up with effective methods in practice to facilitate the masses and make urban roads safer, more orderly and more civilized!

Text | CCTV Review Special Contributor Wang Jian